- Nvidia faces lawsuit for copyright infringement in training NeMo with authors' works
- Lawsuit seeks damages from Nvidia for using copyrighted content in AI model training
- Legal action highlights broader issue of tech companies using copyrighted content for AI models
Nvidia is facing a lawsuit from authors alleging copyright infringement in its AI models, specifically in the training of NeMo using copyrighted works. The lawsuit seeks damages for authors whose works were used to train NeMo's large language models, adding to the growing legal challenges against tech companies over AI model training.
What to know: Nvidia is facing a lawsuit from a group of authors, including Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O'Nan, who claim that the tech giant used their copyrighted works without permission to train its artificial intelligence platform NeMo. The lawsuit alleges that Nvidia admitted to training NeMo on a dataset of 196,640 books, which included works such as Keene's Ghost Walk, Nazemian's Like a Love Story, and O'Nan's Last Night at the Lobster. This legal action is part of a series of lawsuits concerning AI copyright infringement, seeking unspecified damages for U.S. individuals whose works contributed to training NeMo's large language models (LLMs) over the past three years.
Looking ahead: The lawsuit against Nvidia highlights the broader issue of tech companies using copyrighted content to train AI models, with similar legal battles involving other companies like OpenAI and Microsoft. Nvidia's NeMo Megatron AI models, trained on a dataset known as The Pile, were hosted on a website called Hugging Face. The Books3 dataset within The Pile was removed in October 2023 due to reported copyright infringement, leading to the lawsuit against Nvidia. Despite these legal challenges, Nvidia's position as a leading chipmaker for AI chips has driven its stock to surge by almost 600% since the end of 2022, resulting in a market value of nearly $2.2 trillion.
Deeper details: The lawsuit filed against Nvidia in San Francisco federal court accuses the company of infringing on the copyrights of authors by using their works to train its AI platform NeMo. The authors, represented by Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O'Nan, claim that their novels were part of a dataset of 196,640 books utilized by Nvidia before being removed due to copyright concerns. This legal action is part of a larger trend of lawsuits targeting tech companies for using copyrighted content in AI training, with Nvidia joining the ranks of companies like OpenAI and Microsoft facing similar allegations.
The backstory: Nvidia's involvement in a lawsuit over alleged copyright infringement in its AI models, particularly the NeMo platform, underscores the legal challenges faced by tech companies in utilizing copyrighted content for training purposes. The lawsuit, filed by authors Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O'Nan, accuses Nvidia of incorporating their works without authorization in a dataset used to train NeMo. Despite the legal scrutiny, Nvidia's prominent position as a chipmaker for AI technologies has propelled its stock to significant gains, reflecting investor confidence in the company's growth potential in the AI market.
